Tag spiritual songs

SING UNTO THE LORD A NEW SONG

Allen Frederick Leave a comment
Psalms, Hymns, and Spiritual Songs — Why Worship Must Be Alive, Not Archived

Introduction

There is a growing belief in some circles that only the old hymns — especially those found in the Red‑Back Hymnal — are truly biblical, spiritual, or worthy of worship. The same logic is often used to defend the King James Bible as the only language God speaks, as though He prefers Elizabethan English over the common tongue of everyday people. But this mindset collapses the moment we examine Scripture.

The Bible does not command us to preserve a museum of worship. It commands us to sing new songs — fresh expressions of praise that rise from a living relationship with a living God. The psalmist declares, “Sing unto the Lord a new song; sing unto the Lord, all the earth.” (Psalm 96:1). He repeats it again: “O sing unto the Lord a new song; for He hath done marvelous things.” (Psalm 98:1). And again: “He hath put a new song in my mouth, even praise unto our God.” (Psalm 40:3).

These are not suggestions. They are commands. And if we only sing the old songs, we cannot obey them.

The Old Songs: A Gift, Not a Cage

The psalms are the oldest worship songs we possess — Spirit‑breathed, Christ‑centered, eternally relevant. The hymns of the early church were poetic declarations of Christ’s incarnation, humility, death, resurrection, and exaltation. The Red‑Back Hymnal carries echoes of this heritage. It preserves the voices of past generations who sang their faith with conviction. These songs matter. They carry memory, heritage, and testimony.

But they are not the whole story. The New Testament never limits worship to one era, one style, or one book. Paul speaks of psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs, weaving together Scripture, Christ‑centered poetry, and Spirit‑breathed expression. Worship was never meant to be frozen in time. It was meant to be alive.

The New Songs: Spirit‑Breathed Worship for Today

Paul instructs the church to sing spiritual songs — songs birthed from the Spirit’s present work, not merely inherited from the past. These are the songs that rise from fresh encounters with God, from new mercies, from present grace, from today’s deliverance, and from the testimonies God is still writing.

Modern worship often lives in this lane. Songs that declare God’s goodness, faithfulness, mercy, and presence resonate because they speak to what God is doing now. And Scripture commands this: “Sing unto the Lord a new song.”

Not because the old songs are bad.
Not because tradition is wrong.
But because God is still moving, still speaking, still revealing Himself.

A God who is alive deserves worship that is alive.

Even heaven sings new songs. John writes, “And they sang a new song, saying, Thou art worthy… for Thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by Thy blood.” (Revelation 5:9). If heaven sings new songs, the church on earth cannot cling only to the old ones.

Why “New Song” Matters

You cannot obey the command to sing a new song if you only sing the old ones. You cannot honor the Spirit’s present work if you only honor the Spirit’s past work. You cannot grow in worship if you only repeat what previous generations wrote.

The Red‑Back Hymnal is a blessing. Modern worship is a blessing. But neither is the whole blessing. The old songs remind us where we came from. The new songs remind us where God is taking us. Worship must hold both — the roots of the old and the fruit of the new — because God is the God of both memory and movement.

The New Testament Pattern: Worship Must Be Alive

Paul gives the church a worship blueprint: “Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord.” (Ephesians 5:19). He echoes it again: “Teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.” (Colossians 3:16).

This is not a hierarchy. This is not a limitation. This is not a tradition. It is a three‑fold expression of worship — Scripture, Christ‑centered poetry, and Spirit‑given expression — all flowing from a heart making melody to the Lord.

Worship is healthiest when it sings all three.

Mechanical Worship vs Living Worship

Many churches today sing songs — but they do not worship. People sing without engaging their hearts. They read lyrics without absorbing truth. They recite hymns without encountering God. They listen to sermons without pondering them. Worship becomes mechanical, predictable, and routine.

But Jesus did not come to preserve ritual. He came to open a new and living way. The writer of Hebrews says, “By a new and living way, which He hath consecrated for us…” (Hebrews 10:20). Worship is not a performance, not a ritual, not a tradition, not a projection on a screen. Worship is attention, affection, surrender, awe, gratitude, revelation, and encounter. Singing is not worship. Worship is worship. Singing becomes worship only when the heart is engaged.

A Living Way, Not a Liturgical Museum

Some believers defend the old songs because they are familiar. Others defend the new songs because they are fresh. But Scripture defends neither. Scripture defends worship that is alive.

The old way was stone tablets, but the new way is Spirit‑written hearts. The old way was ritual, but the new way is relationship. The old way was temple worship, but the new way is Spirit and truth. The old way was law, but the new way is grace. The old way was tradition, but the new way is transformation.

We cannot cling to the old at the expense of the new. We cannot cling to tradition at the expense of truth. We cannot cling to hymns at the expense of the Spirit.

What Is a Biblical Hymn? Recovering the Apostolic Pattern of Worship

Allen Frederick Leave a comment

For generations, Christians have sung with confidence, quoting Paul’s familiar exhortation to offer “psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs” as an act of worship. Yet few pause long enough to ask the most foundational question: What did Paul actually mean when he used the word hymn? The answer is not found in the pages of a hymnbook, nor in the poetic stanzas of the Reformation, nor in the revivalist songs of the nineteenth century. To understand the biblical hymn, we must return to the first century, where the church sang something far simpler, far deeper, and far more Christ-centered than anything we typically call a hymn today.

This is not an attack on hymns. It is an invitation to clarity. It is a call to recover the apostolic pattern of worship—one rooted not in tradition, but in Scripture itself.

The Apostolic Hymn: Singing the Gospel, Not Singing About the Gospel

When Paul instructed the church to sing “psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs” (Ephesians 5:19; Colossians 3:16), he was not referring to the English hymn tradition, the Lutheran chorales, or the poetic works of Watts, Wesley, or Crosby. None of these existed. A biblical hymn was a very specific kind of worship: a Christ-centered confession, a doctrinal poem, a proclamation of the gospel in a form the church could memorize and recite together.

The New Testament preserves several of these hymns. The most famous is the Christ Hymn of Philippians 2:6–11, which declares:

“Who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God…” (Philippians 2:6, NKJV)

This hymn traces Christ’s descent into humility and His exaltation to the Father’s right hand. Likewise, the majestic confession of Colossians 1:15–20 proclaims Christ as the image of the invisible God, the Creator and Sustainer of all things, and the One through whom God reconciles the world to Himself. And in 1 Timothy 3:16, Paul quotes another early hymn:

“God was manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels…” (1 Timothy 3:16, NKJV)

These passages are not songs about Christ. They are the gospel itself, sung in poetic form. This is biblical hymnody.

How the Church Drifted From Apostolic Hymns

The early church did not require choirs, pipe organs, orchestras, drums, or electric guitars. They did not need hymnals or printed stanzas. Their worship was simple, communal, and Scripture-saturated. They sang the Word. They sang Christ. They sang doctrine.

But over time, the church drifted.

In the fourth through sixth centuries, worship became increasingly formalized. Singing moved from the congregation to the clergy. Chant remained rooted in Scripture, but it became Latin, complex, and inaccessible to the average believer. The people stopped singing the Word and began listening to the Word being sung.

By the Middle Ages, Gregorian chant dominated the church’s musical life. It was beautiful and reverent, but it was no longer congregational. The apostolic pattern of simple, Scripture-shaped singing had faded.

The Reformation of the sixteenth century sought to correct this. Luther, Calvin, and others restored congregational singing by creating metrical poetry—rhyming stanzas set to simple melodies. These were Reformation hymns, not biblical hymns. They replaced Latin chant with vernacular poetry, restoring participation but not restoring the apostolic form. They replaced Scripture-shaped confession with theological reflection.

Beautiful? Yes. Biblical hymns? No.

When God Moves Outside the System: Why the Church Often Rejects What Heaven Sends

One of the most consistent patterns in Scripture and church history is the tendency of religious institutions to resist what God births when it does not emerge from the “approved” structures. The early disciples did not face persecution because they were immoral or heretical. They were persecuted because they were unauthorized. They preached without rabbinic credentials. They healed without temple sanction. They proclaimed Christ without the blessing of the religious elite.

The Sanhedrin did not say, “These men are wrong.” They said, “By what authority do you do these things?” (Matthew 21:23). In other words: “Who gave you permission?”

This same question has echoed through every century of church history.

When God moves outside the structures we build, the structures often respond with suspicion, resistance, or outright hostility. Jesus Himself experienced this. He taught on hillsides, in homes, on boats, and in fields—anywhere except the places the religious establishment controlled. And for this, He was labeled dangerous, untrained, and subversive.

The early church followed the same pattern. They met in homes, courtyards, and open spaces. They broke bread without priests. They preached without liturgy. They baptized without ecclesiastical approval. And for this, they were beaten, imprisoned, and silenced.

The issue was not doctrine. The issue was control.

This same dynamic resurfaced in the Jesus Movement of the 1960s and 70s. Young believers—barefoot, unpolished, emotional, and hungry for God—flooded into the kingdom. They sang Scripture. They worshiped with guitars. They baptized in the ocean. They prayed with passion. They broke every rule of “respectable religion.”

And the institutional church responded much like the Pharisees did in the first century:

“This is too emotional.”
“This is too unstructured.”
“This is too radical.”
“This is not how we do things.”

The problem was not the theology. The problem was the source.

It did not come through the denominational pipeline. It did not emerge from the seminary. It did not fit the liturgical mold. It did not look like the “frozen chosen.” So it was dismissed.

And with it, the most Scripture-saturated worship movement since the book of Acts was dismissed as well.

The church often rejects the fruit of a movement because it does not like the tree it grew on. The Pharisees rejected Jesus because He came from Nazareth. The early church was rejected because it came from fishermen. The Jesus Movement was rejected because it came from hippies. Modern worship is rejected because it comes from charismatic churches.

But God has never been concerned with the packaging. He has always been concerned with the substance.

The Jesus Movement and the Accidental Recovery of Biblical Hymnody

In the 1970s through the 1990s, something unexpected happened. The Jesus Movement—often dismissed as emotional, unstructured, or “hippie Christianity”—produced the most biblical worship movement since the first century. Maranatha!, Hosanna!, and Integrity Music began setting Scripture to simple, memorable melodies.

They did not set out to revive apostolic hymnody. They simply wanted believers to memorize the Word of God. Yet in doing so, they restored Scripture-first worship, doctrinal confession, and congregational simplicity. They maintained the integrity of the Word—no fluff, no filler. They did not need complex instrumentation or poetic stanzas. They sang the Word itself.

This was the closest the modern church has come to the apostolic pattern.

Why Recovering the Biblical Hymn Matters

This teaching is not about attacking hymns or elevating modern worship. It is about clarity. It is about using biblical words the way the Bible used them. It is about recognizing that Reformation hymns are songs of the Reformation, gospel songs are songs of revival, modern worship songs are songs of devotion, and Scripture songs are the closest modern expression to biblical hymns.

A Reformation hymn reflects Scripture. A biblical hymn proclaims Scripture. A gospel song expresses faith. A biblical hymn confesses Christ. A modern worship song describes our response. A biblical hymn declares His work.

This distinction matters because worship shapes theology, theology shapes discipleship, and discipleship shapes the church. If we want the Word of Christ to dwell in us richly, we must return to singing the Word of Christ—not merely singing about it, around it, or inspired by it.

Conclusion: Returning to the Apostolic Pattern

The early church did not sing their feelings, their experiences, or their poetic reflections. They sang Christ’s incarnation, His humility, His obedience, His death, His exaltation, His supremacy, and His reconciliation of all things. They sang the gospel. And when the church sings the gospel, the church remembers the gospel.

Recovering the biblical hymn is not about diminishing tradition. It is about restoring the foundation. It is about returning to the apostolic pattern: Christ proclaimed, Christ confessed, Christ exalted, Christ sung.

This is biblical hymnody. And it is worth recovering.

From Psalms, to Hymns, to Spiritual Songs: Rediscovering the Full Voice of Worship

Allen Frederick Leave a comment

🎶 From Psalms to Hymns to Spiritual Songs: Rediscovering the Full Voice of Worship

There’s a rhythm in the Spirit that many of us miss—not because we’re tone-deaf, but because we’ve grown accustomed to singing in only one key. Paul’s words in Colossians 3:16 and Ephesians 5:19 aren’t just poetic—they’re prophetic. He’s inviting the Church into a threefold harmony: psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs.

But what does that sound like in real life?

📖 The Psalmist’s Cry: Worship That Anchors

David didn’t write songs to impress anyone. He wrote them to survive. In caves, on battlefields, in royal courts and lonely nights, his psalms were raw, reverent, and real. When he sang, “Why are you cast down, O my soul?” (Psalm 42:5), he wasn’t performing—he was pleading.

Psalms are the worship of the anchored heart. They remind us that God is not afraid of our questions, our laments, or our longings. They teach us to worship with Scripture as our vocabulary and honesty as our posture.

In today’s worship culture, we need to recover this. Not just quoting psalms—but singing them. Letting the Word shape our sound.

🕊️ The Hymn-Writers’ Declaration: Worship That Teaches

Fast forward to Paul and Silas in prison. Shackled, bruised, and unjustly accused, what did they do? “About midnight Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns to God…” (Acts 16:25). Not psalms. Hymns.

Why hymns? Because hymns declare what we believe when everything else is shaking. They’re theological anchors in emotional storms. Whether penned by Luther, Watts, or Fanny Crosby, hymns carry the weight of doctrine wrapped in melody.

Hymns are the worship of the instructed heart. They teach us to sing truth—not just feel it. And in a world drowning in opinions, we need songs that remind us who God is, not just how we feel.

🔥 The Spirit’s Whisper: Worship That Responds

Then there’s the upper room. No hymnals. No setlists. Just wind, fire, and spontaneous utterance. The early Church didn’t just sing about God—they sang with Him. Spiritual songs are the overflow of divine encounter. They’re the worship of the responsive heart.

Think of Mary, pregnant with promise, breaking into spontaneous praise: “My soul magnifies the Lord…” (Luke 1:46). Or the Church in Corinth, where Paul encouraged Spirit-led singing alongside prophecy and teaching (1 Corinthians 14:15).

Spiritual songs are risky. They’re unscripted. But they’re also intimate. And if we silence them, we may miss the now-word of God.

🎯 So What’s the Point?

This isn’t a progression from old to new. It’s not a regression from structured to spontaneous. It’s a divine triad—a full-bodied worship expression. Psalms root us. Hymns instruct us. Spiritual songs release us.

When we lean too heavily on one, we lose the richness of the whole:

Psalms without spiritual songs become liturgical but lifeless.

Hymns without psalms become doctrinal but disconnected.

Spiritual songs without hymns become emotional but unanchored.

💬 A Personal Reflection

I remember a season when all I could sing were psalms. Life was heavy, and I needed the Word to carry me. Then came a time when hymns became my declaration—truth over turmoil. And now, I find myself drawn to spiritual songs—those moments when the Spirit sings through me what I didn’t even know I needed to say.

Worship isn’t just music. It’s movement. And God invites us to sing in every season, with every sound.

🙌 Let’s Sing the Full Song

Let the Word dwell richly. Let the truth ring loudly. Let the Spirit flow freely.

Whether you’re in a cave like David, a prison like Paul, or an upper room like the early Church—there’s a song for you.

Sing the psalm. Declare the hymn. Release the spiritual song.

This has been a View From the Nest. Please Like share and subscribe. Thank you.

What is on your playlist?: What song do you keep singing?

Allen Frederick Leave a comment

Insight for your “Journey across the Sky”

A View from the Nest www.eagleviews.org

psalm981cI was never one for listening to the top 40 radio stations growing up, primarily because they would keep repeating the same few songs over and over and over again. There are still some songs today I can not stand to listen to because of the constant air play they received when they were first released.

Here are a few of my not so favorite songs: ‘You Light up my Life’ (after a while I just wanted to turn that light off). ‘Don’tWorry Be Happy’ (this song was driving me absolutely bonkers with that incessant whistling). ‘Music Box Dancer’ (if I had a music box that played that song I would have smashed it to smithereens before long) and then the infamous ‘My Heart Will Go On’. Celine I love you baby but enough of the going on and on. I think that song played on the radio, in stores, on the bus, and in the elevator for about a year. There have been others which I have just grown tired of hearing. The first few times I may have loved the song but then it just became an annoyance to have to listen to it again and again.

On the flip side there are those timeless classics that any music collection would be incomplete without. One that comes to mind is ‘The Unchained Melody’, righteously done by the Righteous brothers. Elvis’s ‘Suspicious Minds’ and ‘Heartbreak Hotel’. Add to that the Eagles with ‘Hotel California’. The Beatles contribute many but a couple could be ‘Hey Jude’, ‘Let it Be’ and John Lennon’s immortal ‘Imagine’. One can not forget the Beach Boys with their surfing sound, ‘Good Vibrations’, and ‘God Only Knows’. A day at the beach would not be complete without hearing at least once ‘Under the Boardwalk’ by the Driftersand ‘Sittin’ on the Dock of the Bay’ by Ottis Redding. The list could go on and on like Celine’s song did but I think you get the picture.

Music through the ages

Down through the years music has changed and lasting hits seem to be fewer and fewer. With all the influx of indie bands and record labels, it seems like no sooner does a band have a hit song that they fade from memory. Artists like the Beatles, Beach Boys, and Elvis have stood the test of time.

In the church house I believe we have our play lists as well. Songs we sing over and over again. Some of my all time favorites for a Sunday morning are: ‘How Great Thou Art’, ‘Amazing Grace’, ‘Blessed Assurance’, ‘It Is Well with My Soul’, ‘He Leadeth Me’, ‘Here is Love’, ‘A Mighty Fortress is Our God’, ‘Do Not Pass Me By’ and ‘Joyful, Joyful We Adore Thee’, just to name a few. Continue reading “What is on your playlist?: What song do you keep singing?” →