Tag false teaching

Facebook Pharisees, Digital False Prophets

Allen Frederick Leave a comment

An editorial for the age of the algorithm—

There was a time when false prophets needed a crowd, a marketplace, or a pulpit to spread their delusions. Now they just need Wi‑Fi.

Open Facebook, scroll for five minutes, and you’ll meet them: the self‑appointed seers, the “thus‑saith‑the‑Lord” status updates, the viral rebukes dressed up as “discernment,” the spiritual hot takes that sound more like clickbait than cross‑bearing. It’s a strange new world where anyone can claim divine authority with a ring light and a strong opinion.

Scripture, however, is not surprised.

Jesus warned, “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves” (Matthew 7:15). The medium has changed—from hillside sermons to social media feeds—but the danger has not. The wolves have simply learned how to use hashtags.

The rise of Facebook Pharisees

Let’s start with the “Facebook Pharisees”—those who weaponize Bible verses in comment sections, not to build up, but to win arguments and score public righteousness points.

The Pharisees of Jesus’ day were not cartoon villains. They were serious, religious, biblically literate people. Yet Jesus said of them, “This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me” (Matthew 15:8}). They loved the appearance of holiness, the respect of the crowd, the feeling of being right. Social media has given that same spirit a global platform.

You’ve seen it:

  • The thread where someone vulnerably shares a struggle, and instead of compassion, they get a barrage of proof‑texts and cold rebukes.
  • The “discernment” post that names and shames other believers, not to restore them, but to rally a tribe.
  • The public call‑out that conveniently forgets Jesus’ instructions about going to a brother privately first (Matthew 18:15}).

Jesus described Pharisees as those who “tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger” (Matthew 23:4}). That’s what happens when we use Facebook to pile guilt, shame, and spiritual pressure on others, while our own hearts remain untouched by grace.

The Facebook Pharisee is more concerned with being seen as doctrinally pure than being known as Christlike. They forget that “the aim of our charge is love that issues from a pure heart and a good conscience and a sincere faith” ({1 Timothy 1:5}). Truth without love is not biblical boldness; it’s spiritual brutality.

Digital false prophets and the platform problem

If the Facebook Pharisee misuses truth, the digital false prophet distorts it.

We live in an age where anyone can start a page, call themselves “Prophet So‑and‑So,” and begin declaring dreams, visions, and “urgent words” to thousands of followers. Jesus’ warning feels painfully current: “Many false prophets will arise and lead many astray” (Matthew 24:11}).

False prophets are not new. Jeremiah had to confront them in his day:

“I have heard what the prophets have said who prophesy lies in my name, saying, ‘I have dreamed, I have dreamed!’ … They are prophesying the delusions of their own minds.”
(Jeremiah 23:25–26})

Social media has simply amplified their reach. A “word from the Lord” can now be shared, liked, and believed by millions before anyone asks the most basic biblical question: Did it come true? God’s standard is clear: “When a prophet speaks in the name of the Lord, if the word does not come to pass or come true, that is a word that the Lord has not spoken” (Deuteronomy 18:22}).

Yet online, failed prophecies are rarely repented of. They are quietly deleted, re‑framed, or buried under the next “urgent update.” The platform continues. The followers remain. The algorithm rewards engagement, not accuracy.

Digital false prophets often share common traits:

They prioritize visibility over accountability.
They operate without a local church, elders, or real spiritual oversight. But Scripture assumes prophets are tested in community: “Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said” (1 Corinthians 14:29}). Online, there is often no “others” to weigh—only fans to applaud.

They center the message on prosperity and personal breakthrough.
God does bless, but when every “word” is about money, success, and “your next level,” we’ve drifted from the biblical pattern. True prophetic ministry calls people to repentance, holiness, and faithfulness. False prophets, by contrast, “heal the wound of my people lightly, saying, ‘Peace, peace,’ when there is no peace” (Jeremiah 6:14}).

They use fear and urgency to manipulate.
“Something terrible is coming—only those who sow a seed will be protected.” That’s not biblical prophecy; that’s spiritual blackmail. The gospel is not a subscription service you pay to avoid disaster. God does not sell protection through PayPal links.

They rarely preach the cross.
Paul resolved “to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2:2}). If a digital prophet’s feed is full of dreams, dates, and dramatic declarations but empty of the cross, repentance, and the hope of resurrection, something is deeply off.

The algorithm is not the Holy Spirit

One of the most subtle dangers in this age is confusing virality with validity.

A post goes viral, and we assume God must be in it. A “word” gets shared 100,000 times, and we treat it as confirmation. But the Bible never equates popularity with truth. In fact, Jesus says, “Woe to you, when all people speak well of you, for so their fathers did to the false prophets” (Luke 6:26}).

The algorithm is designed to reward outrage, novelty, and emotional intensity. The Holy Spirit, by contrast, produces “love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self‑control” (Galatians 5:22–23}). If a feed is full of anger, fear, and division—even if it’s draped in Bible verses—it may be driven more by the flesh than by the Spirit.

We need to recover a simple discipline: “Do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (1 John 4:1}). Testing means:

  • Comparing every teaching with the whole counsel of Scripture, not just isolated verses.
  • Watching the fruit of a person’s life over time, not just the flair of their latest post.
  • Asking whether the message leads us to deeper love for Christ, greater obedience, and genuine humility—or just deeper obsession with signs, predictions, and personalities.

The Bereans were commended because they “examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true” (Acts 17:11}). If they tested the apostle Paul, we can certainly test our favorite Facebook prophet.

When we “love to have it so”

Here’s the uncomfortable part: false prophets and Facebook Pharisees don’t exist in a vacuum. They thrive because we follow them.

Jeremiah said, “The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests rule at their direction; my people love to have it so” ({Jeremiah 5:31}). That line cuts deep. Sometimes we prefer the drama of sensational “words” to the slow, steady work of discipleship. We’d rather have spiritual entertainment than spiritual formation.

We click, we share, we comment, we feed the very voices that confuse us. Then we wonder why our faith feels scattered and anxious.

The truth is, God sometimes allows false voices to flourish as a test: “For the Lord your God is testing you, to know whether you love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul” (Deuteronomy 13:3}). The question is not just, “Are they false?” but “What does my attraction to them reveal about my heart?”

Do I chase prophetic drama because I’m bored with simple obedience?
Do I crave spiritual celebrities because I’ve neglected the ordinary means of grace—Scripture, prayer, fellowship, sacrament?
Do I prefer outrage posts because they let me feel righteous without actually repenting?

These are not comfortable questions, but they are necessary ones.

A different way to be online

So what does faithfulness look like in the age of Facebook Pharisees and digital false prophets?

First, we anchor ourselves in Scripture.
“You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free” (John 8:32}). The more deeply we know the Word, the less easily we are swayed by spiritual trends. We don’t need a constant stream of “new revelation” when we haven’t yet obeyed the revelation we already have.

Second, we stay rooted in real community.
Online voices can be helpful, but they are not a substitute for a local church, pastors, and brothers and sisters who actually know our lives. The New Testament assumes believers are joined to a body where gifts are tested, character is seen, and accountability is real (Hebrews 10:24–25}).

Third, we practice humility in our own posting.
Before we hit “post,” we can ask: Is this building up or tearing down? Is this about Christ or about me? Am I speaking as one who will “give an account for every careless word” (Matthew 12:36})? We don’t have to be silent, but we do have to be sober.

Fourth, we refuse to participate in public stoning.
There is a place for warning against false teaching—that’s biblical. Paul did it (Acts 20:29–31}). But there is also a way of “discernment” that becomes a sport of humiliation. When we delight in exposing others more than we grieve over sin, we have slipped into the spirit of the Pharisee who prayed, “God, I thank you that I am not like other men” (Luke 18:11}).

Finally, we fix our eyes on Jesus, not on the feed.
The writer of Hebrews calls us to be “looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2}). Social media constantly invites us to look at ourselves, our brand, our enemies, our fears. The gospel invites us to look at Christ—crucified, risen, reigning—and to let His voice be louder than any timeline.

Conclusion: less spectacle, more Savior

The Church does not need more Facebook Pharisees or digital false prophets. We need ordinary, faithful believers who quietly love God, love neighbor, and refuse to let the algorithm disciple their souls.

False prophets will continue to arise. Pharisaical spirits will continue to comment. The feed will continue to churn. But in the midst of it, God’s call remains the same:

“Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind” (Matthew 22:37}).
“Walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh” (Galatians 5:16}).
“Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly” (Colossians 3:16}).

In an age of digital noise, that kind of quiet, rooted faith may not go viral—but it will endure. And in the end, when every platform has faded and every feed has gone silent, it won’t be the Facebook Pharisees or the digital false prophets who stand. It will be those who heard the Shepherd’s voice, tested every other voice by His Word, and chose, day after day, to follow Him.



This has been “{A View From the Nest} and that is the way I see it. What say you?

DAMNABLE HERESIES & THE LEAVEN OF THE PHARISEES

Allen Frederick Leave a comment
A Modern Exposé of an Ancient Plague

Introduction: When Leaven Masquerades as Doctrine

There is a reason Scripture warns us repeatedly about leaven. Leaven is subtle. It works quietly, invisibly, and inevitably until the entire loaf is swollen with mixture. Paul warned, “A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.” (Galatians 5:9) Jesus warned His disciples, “Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees.” (Matthew 16:6) Peter warned of “damnable heresies” secretly introduced among the people. (2 Peter 2:1) These warnings were not aimed at pagans or outsiders. They were aimed at religious contamination — the kind that looks holy, sounds authoritative, and feels familiar, yet carries the poison of human influence.

The tragedy of modern Christianity is that we have inherited a system built on commentary, tradition, denominational identity, and seminary interpretation, all presented as “sound doctrine.” But Jude’s command to “earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 1:3) refers to the apostolic gospel, not the inherited systems we now defend. The faith once delivered came long before King Jimmy, long before English translations, long before catechisms, councils, and confessions. And yet generation after generation has swallowed these systems whole, regurgitated them, added to them, and passed them down until the loaf is no longer unleavened truth but a mixture of Scripture and human additives.

The Shepherd’s Voice vs. the Voice of Men

Jesus made a statement that should have shaped the entire structure of the church: “My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.” (John 10:27) He also said, “A stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.” (John 10:5) But modern Christianity replaced the Shepherd’s voice with the pastor’s voice. Believers were trained to sit in pews, listen passively, absorb whatever was preached, and call it illumination. In reality, it was indoctrination. They were never taught to discern. They were never taught to test the spirits. They were never taught to hear God for themselves.

And when you cannot hear the Shepherd, you will follow anyone who sounds religious, educated, or authoritative. This is how false shepherds gain influence. This is how Pharisee leaven spreads. This is how damnable heresies take root.

False Shepherds and Religious Noise

The Pharisees knew Scripture inside and out. They memorized it, categorized it, analyzed it, and expounded it until the people were exhausted. But Jesus said, “Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.” (Matthew 22:29) He also said, “This people draweth nigh unto Me with their mouth, and honoureth Me with their lips; but their heart is far from Me.” (Matthew 15:8) And then He delivered the indictment that defines religious leaven: “In vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” (Matthew 15:9)

Modern Pharisees do the same. They preach long sermons, quote Greek and Hebrew, wield seminary degrees, and elevate themselves as the final authority. Meanwhile, the people sit silently, never questioning, never discerning, never hearing God for themselves. This is not discipleship. It is religious conditioning. And conditioned people cannot recognize false shepherds because they have never learned to recognize the True Shepherd.

Man‑Made Doctrine Disguised as Sound Doctrine

Jude’s command to contend for the faith once delivered is a call to return to the apostolic gospel, not the inherited systems we now defend. Paul warned, “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men… and not after Christ.” (Colossians 2:8) Jesus confronted the Pharisees with the same truth: “Ye have made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.” (Matthew 15:6)

When English translators inserted Easter — a word not found in the Greek — they imported Egypt into the bread. And once leaven enters, it spreads. If one word can be altered, what else was shaped by culture, politics, or tradition? The people defend their inherited doctrine fiercely, believing it is pure, never realizing it is leavened. They swallowed it whole, regurgitated it, added to it, and passed it down until the loaf became swollen with mixture.

The Feast of Unleavened Bread: A Spiritual Detox

The Feast of Unleavened Bread was not merely a memorial of Israel’s haste. It was a prophetic picture of purity — a call to remove mixture, eliminate additives, and eat the Word without contamination. God commanded Israel, “Seven days shall ye eat unleavened bread… there shall no leavened bread be seen with thee.” (Exodus 13:7) Paul echoed this when he wrote, “Purge out therefore the old leaven… therefore let us keep the feast… with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.” (1 Corinthians 5:7–8)

The modern church needs this feast. We need a season of purging mixture, rejecting man‑made doctrine, returning to Scripture without filters, and hearing the Shepherd’s voice without interference.

“You Have Heard It Said… But I Say Unto You”

Jesus confronted religious interpretation with a phrase that shattered Pharisee authority: “Ye have heard that it was said… but I say unto you.” (Matthew 5:21–22) He was not correcting sinners. He was correcting religious teachers. He was purging tradition, commentary, interpretation, and doctrinal scaffolding. He replaced the voice of men with the voice of God. The modern church needs this phrase again. Not “you have heard it said,” but “I say unto you.” Not the pastor’s voice. Not the seminary’s voice. Not the commentary’s voice. Not King Jimmy’s voice. The Shepherd’s voice.

Why Apostles and Prophets Were Removed

Paul wrote, “And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets…” (1 Corinthians 12:28) He also said the church is “built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner stone.” (Ephesians 2:20) Apostles correct direction. Prophets expose corruption. Both threaten man‑made systems. Without apostles, the ship drifts. Without prophets, leaven spreads. Without both, pastors become the final authority, teachers become the doctrinal gatekeepers, and the Spirit’s voice is replaced by institutional control.

This was not accidental. It was strategic. The removal of apostles and prophets created a vacuum that pastors and teachers were never meant to fill. And once they became the final authority, the church drifted into Egypt.

Why the Gifts of the Spirit Were Silenced

Paul commanded believers, “Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy.” (1 Corinthians 14:1) He explained, “He that prophesieth speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort.” (1 Corinthians 14:3) And he warned, “Quench not the Spirit. Despise not prophesyings.” (1 Thessalonians 5:19–20)

Prophecy is the anti‑leaven gift. It reveals false teaching, false authority, and false tradition. It bypasses human control and restores the Shepherd’s voice. So the system had to silence it. Tongues were dismissed. Interpretation was ignored. Discernment was discouraged. Prophecy was forbidden. Apostolic authority was replaced with pastoral hierarchy. Because if the gifts operated freely, the entire structure of leaven would collapse.

The People Wanted It This Way

Paul warned Timothy, “The time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears.” (2 Timothy 4:3) Isaiah described the same spirit: “Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things.” (Isaiah 30:10) People prefer predictability, routine, tradition, comfort, and control. They prefer a pastor who thinks for them, interprets for them, decides for them, and filters truth for them. They prefer indoctrination over revelation. They prefer the public‑school model of Christianity — sit, listen, absorb, conform.

But Jesus said, “My sheep hear My voice.” (John 10:27) Not the pastor’s voice. Not the commentary’s voice. Not the catechism’s voice. Not the seminary’s voice. His voice.

Conclusion: Returning to Unleavened Christianity

The Spirit is calling His people back to the simplicity of Christ — back to the Shepherd’s voice, back to Scripture without additives, back to truth without mixture, back to the faith once delivered, back to the feast of unleavened bread. Jesus said, “If any man will hear My voice…” (Revelation 3:20) And again, “He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.” (Revelation 2:7)

This teaching is not an attack on pastors. It is an attack on leaven. It is not a rejection of Scripture. It is a rejection of contamination. It is not rebellion against authority. It is obedience to the Shepherd. It is not a critique of the church. It is a call to purification.

The Spirit is saying, “Purge the leaven. Return to the Shepherd. Keep the feast. Hear My voice.” And those who hear Him will obey no other.


This has been “A View From the Nest” and that is the way I see it! What say you?
Please like, comment and share.